By:almotamar.net - Great public crowd,
Brave tribes of Dahm,
Sisters,
Peace be upon you
I am happy to speak to you about the political motion with regard to the presidential and local council elections. This great, positive experience goes towards a change for the best: a change in development, change through voting boxes, not through the boxes or containers of those who executed others in power. But now we are turning to voting boxes to cast our votes, not to have a dominant influence over this nation through inclusive systems. We are now in the frame of multi-party system. In our life, change goes towards the best. Yemeni unification is a change instead of recantation system.
Development is a change, so are education, electricity, water, and roads. This is the change for the best. We are heading towards the change into the best in the field of inclusive development and in all fields.
I urge our tribes (Dham) to preserve the most important wealth, i.e., antiquities. It is the great wealth and pride for all Yemenis. I feel sorry for the incident that occurred last week in the observatory committee.
Fellow men,
Change is when you vote on 20 September for any one you want of your own accord. Select who you want. No ruler will be imposed on us by means of a tank or terrorism.
Intellectual and cultural terrorism is not acceptable.
On 20 September we will head for voting boxes, and on 21 and 22 September a festival will be held allover the governorates on the occasion of democracy victory.
As we are celebrating today, I tell you that I am not a candidate of one party: I am a candidate of Yemen. I thank brothers in the Joint Meeting Parties (JMP). I thank their good spirit and sportsmanship as they are competing with us, thus giving change a big motion.
I wished the JMP leadership would have entered this competition, because some strained and defeated leaders dare not nominate themselves or present their candidates. It is shame that made them nominate the independent candidate Faisal Bin Shamlan, whom I know very well. But it was better if they had nominated a candidate from among them.
Political speech should be wise on the part of the JMP or some leaders of the joint malice. The political speech of the joint malice leaders states that there will be forgery in the elections as they feel defeat beforehand. Therefore, in their inside and outside speeches they say forgery will take place.
How election forgery will occur while they represent 46 percent of the observatory, main and secondary committees? From where forgery will come while every candidate- whether for local council or presidential elections- has a representative? But to sense defeat beforehand makes them increase this kind of speech that insults Yemen, insults the Yemeni homeland in which this nice political motion takes place. This is the democratic motion, a civilized, positive experience that uplifts Yemen's credit.
I once again thank you, tribes of Dahm, for your receiving us. On 20 September vote for the one(s) you love and want.
|
GPC presidential candidate's speech in al-Jawf governorate
In 2007 the opposition Yemen Congregation for Reform (Islah) Islamic oriented Party maintained its having political and media sway over the Joint meeting Parties (JMP) block, also consisting of Yemen Socialist Party and the Nasserite Unionist Organisation. 
Yemen is practically a cool green paradise, with crisp mountain air, enormous acacia trees, pristine coral reefs and verdant fields bursting with khat, a psychoactive plant that induces mild euphoria. 
Sana'a: Yemen will not be able to combat terror without regional and international cooperation, said a Yemeni official, who warned of the ramifications of letting Yemen fight terrorism alone.
Many journalists covered the funeral of the murdered Minister, Pierre Gemayel, the latest victim in a string of political assassinations in Lebanon.
Doctors use the word “crisis” to describe the point at which a patient either starts to recover or dies. President George W. Bush’s Iraqi patient now seems to have reached that point. Most commentators appear to think that Bush’s latest prescription – a surge of 20,000 additional troops to suppress the militias in Baghdad – will, at best, merely postpone the inevitable death of his dream of a democratic Iraq. Yet as “Battle of Baghdad” begins, factors beyond Bush’s control and not of his making (at least not intentionally) may just save Iraq from its doom.